Webster v. Reproductive Health Services

492 U.S. 490 (1989) · Docket No. 88-605

Full caption: Webster, Attorney General of Missouri v. Reproductive Health Services et al.

Superseded by later abortion cases

Court
U.S. Supreme Court
Argued
April 26, 1989
Decided
July 3, 1989
Majority author
Rehnquist, C.J. (plurality on several issues)
Joined by
White, Kennedy, JJ. (plurality); with O'Connor and Scalia concurring in judgment on various issues
Vote
5-4 (plurality on some issues)

Question presented

Whether provisions of Missouri's abortion law — including a preamble declaring life begins at conception, a ban on use of public facilities/employees for abortion, and a requirement of viability testing at 20 weeks — are unconstitutional.

Holding

The Missouri law is largely constitutional. The preamble poses no constitutional problem as it does not by itself regulate abortion. The prohibition on use of public facilities and employees is constitutional. The viability testing requirement is upheld, though the Court fractured on whether Roe's trimester framework survives.

Key reasoning

Chief Justice Rehnquist's plurality opinion effectively invited reconsideration of Roe's trimester framework, criticizing it as unworkable. Only Justice O'Connor's concurrence prevented outright overruling; her application of the 'unduly burdensome' standard foreshadowed Casey.

§ 1 Reasoning

Chief Justice Rehnquist's plurality opinion effectively invited reconsideration of Roe's trimester framework, criticizing it as unworkable. Only Justice O'Connor's concurrence prevented outright overruling; her application of the 'unduly burdensome' standard foreshadowed Casey.

§ 2 Opinions

Majority

Rehnquist, C.J. (plurality on several issues)

White, Kennedy, JJ. (plurality); with O'Connor and Scalia concurring in judgment on various issues

The Missouri law is largely constitutional. The preamble poses no constitutional problem as it does not by itself regulate abortion. The prohibition on use of public facilities and employees is constitutional. The viability testing requirement is upheld, though the Court fractured on whether Roe's trimester framework survives.

Concurrence

O'Connor, J.

Not joined by any other justice

Concurred in judgment but declined to reconsider Roe, applying her 'undue burden' framework.

Concurrence

Scalia, J.

Not joined by any other justice

Would have overruled Roe outright. Sharply criticized O'Connor for avoiding the question.

Dissent

Blackmun, J.

Brennan, Marshall, JJ.

Warned that Roe's future was in doubt. 'For today, the women of this Nation still retain the liberty to control their destinies. But the signs are evident and very ominous, and a chill wind blows.'

Dissent

Stevens, J.

Not joined by any other justice

Argued the preamble was unconstitutional and other provisions inconsistent with Roe.

“The Missouri Legislature may... implement the desire of the state's citizens to further protect and preserve the life of the unborn in ways it deems appropriate.” Rehnquist, C.J. (plurality) · 492 U.S. at 519

§ 3 Key quotes

“For today, the women of this Nation still retain the liberty to control their destinies. But the signs are evident and very ominous, and a chill wind blows.”
Blackmun, J. (dissenting)492 U.S. at 560
“The rules of Roe were quite good enough for the last 15 years, but they suddenly are not good enough now.”
Scalia, J. (concurring in judgment in part)492 U.S. at 535

§ 4 Practical effect

Signaled that Roe was vulnerable. Motivated massive mobilization on both sides. Missouri restrictions took effect. Prompted successful litigation strategies in later cases (Casey, 1992).

§ 5 Perspectives

The summaries below are descriptive, not evaluative — an attempt to represent fairly how each camp typically frames this case.

Abolitionist framing

Abolitionists cite Webster's preamble language — 'the life of each human being begins at conception' — as important precedent, though Webster did not actually apply the preamble to prohibit abortion.

Mainstream pro-life framing

Missouri's success in defending state restrictions was widely celebrated.

Pro-choice framing

Sounded alarm bells about Roe's future; drove significant political mobilization.

§ 6 Significance

5/ 10

Signaled Roe's growing vulnerability; established that states could withhold public support for abortion; superseded by Casey and Dobbs.

Legal precedential weight6
Practical impact on access5
Movement relevance (abolitionist)4
Enduring relevance, 20263

§ 7 Sources

Secondary sources

  • None recorded.
Editorial note Blackmun's 'chill wind' dissent is one of the most memorable in modern Supreme Court history.