Abhortion · State legal snapshot

District of Columbia

Legal at all stages; statutorily protected. Abortion is legal at all stages of pregnancy in the District of Columbia, codified by statute with no gestational limit, though Congress retains the…

Protected by statute As of12 Jul 2026 Research completed12 Jul 2026 Confidence●●● High

§ I · Gestational limit

● Legal at every stage · no limit
0481216202428323640 wk

│ No ban; right affirmatively codified · D.C. Code § 7-2086.01

§ II · Restriction inventory — 15 checked, 0 in force

●Gestational banNone

●In-person visitsNone

●Method-specific banNone (state)

●Physician-only lawNone

●Parental involvementNone

●Telehealth prescribing banNone

●Waiting periodNone

●Spousal consent or noticeNone

●Abortion trafficking lawNone

●Scripted counselingNone

●Civil bounty (SB8-style)None

●Private insurance restrictionNone

●Ultrasound requirementNone

●Pill-mailing banNone

●Self-managed abortion crimeNone

§ III · Access

Criminal exposure

Procedure

Coverage & interstate

●

Available now

Yes

●

Pregnant person

Expressly exempt

●

Waiting period

0 hours

◐

Medicaid

Hyde only

●

Medication · telehealth

Legal · telehealth allowed

●

Self-managed

Not a crime

●

Compelled visits

0 in person

●

Private insurance

No state restriction

●

Who may perform

Physicians & APCs

●

Provider max penalty

None

●

Minors

No involvement law

●

Shield state

Yes

●

Mailing pills

Not banned

●

Fetal homicide law

None

●

Judicial bypass

No parental law

◐

Major pending change

Yes · see p. 2

✓ Abolition-aligned — forbids abortion or imposes liability◐ Partial — a hurdle, an enjoined law, or a carve-out● No restriction○ Unclear or not applicable

§ IV · Why it is legal — governing authorities

2086 ■

Government Noninterference in Reproductive Health Decisions, D.C. Code § 7-2086.01 — The foundational D.C.

■

Human Rights Sanctuary — Government Nonparticipation, D.C. Code § 2-1461.01 — Core shield law prohibiting D.C.

■

Human Rights Sanctuary — Private Right of Action (Clawback), D.C. Code § 2-1461.02 — Allows D.C.

“The District shall recognize the right of every individual who becomes pregnant to decide whether to carry a pregnancy to term, to give birth, or to have an abortion.”— D.C. Code § 7-2086.01(b)

Fetal personhood — how the contradiction is walled off

● D.C. Code § 7-2086.01(b)

D.C. has no statute or constitutional provision defining an unborn child as a 'person,' 'human being,' or 'child' for purposes of criminal or civil law beyond the…

No statutory fetal personhood

→

● Exempt · pregnant woman

Expressly exempt from all penalty

● Carved out · abortion

Abortion is not chargeable under the homicide statutes.

● Not reached · third parties

No fetal homicide statute

D.C. law presents a notable internal tension between civil and criminal/regulatory treatment of the fetus. On the civil side, the D.C. Wrongful death: Viable fetus is a 'person' for wrongful death.

§ V · Criminal exposure by actor

●

Pregnant woman

Expressly exempt from all penalty

●

Physician

No criminal exposure; protected

●

Non-physician prescriber

Protected; no criminal exposure

●

Helpers · funds

Protected; no criminal exposure

●

Travel helpers

Protected; no travel restrictions

●

Civil bounty

No civil bounty law

✓ the actor faces criminal or civil exposure under state law · ● no exposure · ○ unclear or theoretical

Penalties on the books — top 5

ActorOffensePenalty Pregnant personNo offense; expressly exempt from penaltyNone. D.C. Code § 7-2086.01(c)(3)(A) prohibits any penalty. Physician / health care…No criminal abortion offense existsNone for abortion provision. General medical professional… Pharmacist / prescriberNo criminal abortion offense existsNone for dispensing or prescribing abortion medication within… Helper / assistant / funderNo offense; expressly protectedNone. D.C. Code § 7-2086.01(c)(3)(C)-(D) protects those who… Clinic protester / obstructerWillfully or recklessly interfering with access to…Misdemeanor: fine up to amount set in D.C. Code § 22-3571.01,…
Abhortion · State legal snapshot · District of ColumbiaNot legal advice — verify citations before reliance · 1 / 2

§ VI · How the law got here ● court  ■ statute  ◆ executive / agency

6 May 2020■

D.C. Law 23-90 (Strengthening Reproductive Health Protections Amendment Act of 2020) took effect, codifying in D.C.

23 Feb 2023■

D.C.

23 Feb 2023■

D.C.

3 Dec 2025◆

Rep. Andrew Clyde (GA-09) introduced the D.C.

§ VII · Exceptions matrix

Named in lawVerified Life of the pregnant personNot applicable; no ban to except from●— Physical healthNot applicable●— Mental healthNot applicable●— RapeNot applicable●— IncestNot applicable●— Fatal fetal anomalyNot applicable●— Miscarriage · ectopic careNot applicable●✓

Named in law: ◐ the exception is written into the ban · ✓ no such exception · ● no ban for an exception to operate against. Verified (neutral): ✓ quoted text confirmed at source · ◐ semi-verified · ○ verify before publication · — not applicable.

§ VIII · Shield law & interstate

● Shield state

Strong shield state

● Travel unrestricted

Travel out fully lawful; no restriction

● Telehealth prescribing allowed

Telehealth permitted; no in-state restriction

● Pill mailing not banned

Protected under current law

● Funding help protected

Protected; no funding prohibition

● Providing information

Protected; no information liability

Interstate postureD.C. is a robust shield jurisdiction: its laws prohibit government cooperation with out-of-state investigations, block subpoenas, protect provider licenses, and create a clawback right of action…

§ IX · Who pays

Hyde Amendment only; Dornan rider

Life

Hyde · federal

Rape

Hyde · federal

Incest

Hyde · federal

Beyond Hyde

Not covered

●

Mandatory coverage without cost-sharing

All exchange plans cover abortion

◐

No defunding; no affirmative state funding

§ X · Pending changes status and effect as recorded — no forecast

Litigation

Louisiana v. FDA (mifepristone litigation)Fifth Circuit ordered reinstatement of in-person dispensing requirements for mifepristone; Supreme Court…

If the Fifth Circuit order ultimately takes effect, in-person dispensing would be required for mifepristone nationwide, including in D.C., eliminating mail-order and…

Litigation

Florida and Texas v. FDA (mifepristone approval challenge)Filed December 2025 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Challenges FDA's original 2000…

If successful, could remove mifepristone from the U.S. market entirely, ending medication abortion nationwide — including in D.C.

Legislation

D.C. Shield Law Repeal Act (federal)Introduced Dec. 3, 2025, by Rep. Andrew Clyde (GA-09); referred to committee. Has not been enacted.

Would nullify D.C. Law 24-257 (Human Rights Sanctuary Amendment Act of 2022), eliminating D.C.'s shield protections and exposing D.C.-based providers, patients, and…

§ XI · Key authorities ● case  ■ statute  ◆ agency

■Government Noninterference in Reproductive Health… D.C. Code § 7-2086.01

■Human Rights Sanctuary — Government Nonparticipation D.C. Code § 2-1461.01

■Human Rights Sanctuary — Private Right of Action… D.C. Code § 2-1461.02

■Private Insurance Abortion Coverage Mandate D.C. Code § 31-3834.03a

■Clinic Access Protection D.C. Code § 22-1314.02

■Licensing Board Shield for Reproductive Health Care D.C. Code § 3-1205.14(e-1)

●Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Williams 482 A.2d 394 (D.C. 1984)

■D.C. Law 23-90 (Strengthening Reproductive Health… D.C. Law 23-90 (2020)

■D.C. Law 24-254 (Enhancing Reproductive Health… D.C. Law 24-254 (2023)

■D.C. Law 24-257 (Human Rights Sanctuary Amendment Act) D.C. Law 24-257 (2023)

◆Minor Consent for Abortion D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 22-B, § 600.7

■Home Rule Act — Congressional Review D.C. Code § 1-206.02(c)(1)

◐ Semi-verified — confirm at sourceIn-person visits · Fetal homicide
○ Verify before publicationWhether the Dornan Amendment has been renewed in the current (FY 2025 or FY 2026) D.C. appropriations bill at the time of research. It has been…
← Full District of Columbia survey Download PDF