§ 1 Letters signed
5 letters, 2018–2026, oldest first. The last column shows who signed for the organization on that letter, with the title and organization name exactly as printed.
| Date | Letter | Score | Signed as |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2018 | Pro-life coalition letter to HHS Secretary Azar urging reinstatement of the Reagan Title X regulationsCoalition letter · Title X / abortion-provider separationBy implication | 3 / 12 | Georgette Forney, Presidentas “Anglicans for Life” |
| Jul 15, 2024 | AAF Pro-Life Coalition Letter to Republican National Convention delegates on the platformCoalition letter · Republican platform abortion languageExplicit incrementalism | 4 / 12 | Georgette Forney, Presidentas “Anglicans for Life” |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Letter from 88 pro-life organizations: no federal funding for ACA plans that cover abortionCoalition letter · ACA subsidies / HydeBy implication | 3 / 12 | Organization only |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Open letter to the Trump Administration on ICE detention of pregnant, postpartum and nursing womenCoalition letter · Pregnant detainee protectionsBy implication | 3 / 12 | Canon Georgette Forney, Presidentas “Anglicans for Life” |
| Apr 13, 2026 | Letter from 78 pro-life groups to Acting AG Blanche urging DOJ to stop siding with the abortion drug industryCoalition letter · Mifepristone litigation / state lawsBy implication | 4 / 12 | Georgette Forney, President |
§ 2 Scoring profile
Derived from the letters above — a description of what this organization put its name to, not a rating of the organization itself.
Letters signed
5
Mean composite
3.4 of 12
Fault-line letters
0 scored D2 or D4 ≥ 1
By shortfall type
1 explicit incrementalism · 4 by implication
§ 3 People who signed for this organization
| Person | Titles as printed | Letters |
|---|---|---|
| Georgette Forney | President | 4 |
§ 4 Names as printed
Every spelling of this organization encountered across the letters, merged into this one entry.
Anglicans for Life
Editorial note
Organization type, state and parent organization are heuristics for filtering, not authoritative registrations. State Right-to-Life and Citizens-for-Life bodies are linked to the National Right to Life Committee by naming pattern — inferred, not verified. The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life.