§ 1 Letters signed
5 letters, 2021–2026, oldest first. The last column shows who signed for the organization on that letter, with the title and organization name exactly as printed.
| Date | Letter | Score | Signed as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2021 | Pro-life coalition letter opposing the Equality Act (H.R. 5 / S. 393)Coalition letter · Equality Act / abortion mandateBy implication | 3 / 12 | Nathan Winters, Executive Directoras “Family Policy Alliance of Wyoming” |
| Mar 26, 2025 | Letter from 150+ pro-life leaders urging Congress to defund Big Abortion through reconciliationCoalition letter · Planned Parenthood / Medicaid fundingBy implication | 3 / 12 | Organization only |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Letter from 88 pro-life organizations: no federal funding for ACA plans that cover abortionCoalition letter · ACA subsidies / HydeBy implication | 3 / 12 | Organization only |
| Jan 9, 2026 | Hyde Pro-Life Coalition Letter to Trump, Vance, Thune and JohnsonCoalition letter · Hyde Amendment / health-care marketplaceBy implication | 4 / 12 | Nathan Winters, President & CEO |
| Jun 23, 2026 | Letter from 83 pro-life groups urging Acting AG Blanche to settle Louisiana v. FDACoalition letter · Louisiana v. FDA / mifepristoneBy implication | 4 / 12 | Nathan Winters, President & CEO |
§ 2 Scoring profile
Derived from the letters above — a description of what this organization put its name to, not a rating of the organization itself.
Letters signed
5
Mean composite
3.4 of 12
Fault-line letters
0 scored D2 or D4 ≥ 1
By shortfall type
5 by implication
§ 3 People who signed for this organization
| Person | Titles as printed | Letters |
|---|---|---|
| Nathan Winters | Executive Director; President & CEO | 3 |
§ 4 Names as printed
Every spelling of this organization encountered across the letters, merged into this one entry.
Family Policy Alliance of Wyoming
Editorial note
Organization type, state and parent organization are heuristics for filtering, not authoritative registrations. State Right-to-Life and Citizens-for-Life bodies are linked to the National Right to Life Committee by naming pattern — inferred, not verified. The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life.