---
title: "Letter to President George W. Bush urging a comprehensive ban on human cloning"
description: "Coalition letter from Coalition of 25+ pro-life leaders and academics, January 14, 2002, to President George W. Bush. Composite 3/12 — incrementalist by implication. “urged a comprehensive ban on all human cloning”"
type: "letter"
letter_id: "PL-2002-001"
date: "2002-01-14"
letter_type: "Coalition letter"
lead_org: "Coalition of 25+ pro-life leaders and academics"
recipient: "President George W. Bush"
topic: "Human cloning / embryo research"
shortfall_type: "incrementalist_by_implication"
composite: 3
verification: "secondary"
signature_rows: 0
primary_url: "https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/major-pro-life-campaigns-launched-in-us/"
source_url: "https://www.abhortion.org/letters/pl-2002-001.html"
---

# Letter to President George W. Bush urging a comprehensive ban on human cloning

**Coalition letter** · January 14, 2002 · Incrementalist by implication · composite 3 / 12 · Secondary coverage only

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Letter ID | PL-2002-001 |
| Date | January 14, 2002 |
| Lead organization | Coalition of 25+ pro-life leaders and academics |
| Recipient | President George W. Bush |
| Topic | Human cloning / embryo research |
| Type | Coalition letter |
| Verification | Secondary coverage only |
| Signature rows | None recovered (25+ reported) |
| Completeness | Signature block not recovered |

## Key language

> “urged a comprehensive ban on all human cloning” — Coalition of 25+ pro-life leaders and academics, January 14, 2002

## Scorecard

Composite **3 of 12** — incrementalist by implication. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score. D2 and D4 are the fault line the abolitionist critique cares most about.

| Dimension | Score | Meaning at this score | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| D1 Exceptions | 0 | None | — |
| D2 Immunity for the mother (fault line) | 0 | None | — |
| D3 Incrementalism | 1 | By implication — a funding, drug, research, Hyde or Title X letter that takes no abolition position | Seeks regulation/defunding/enforcement rather than abolition; takes no position on equal protection. |
| D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills (fault line) | 0 | None | — |
| D5 Framing | 0 | None | — |
| D6 Secular framing | 2 | Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument | Argued on fiscal, legal, medical or political grounds rather than Scripture/Gospel. |

## Signatories

**Signature block not recovered.** A letter record exists but the signature block was not located; no signature rows. The letter reported 25+ signers.

## Sources

- [lifesitenews.com/news/major-pro-life…](https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/major-pro-life-campaigns-launched-in-us/) — Secondary coverage only (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/major-pro-life-campaigns-launched-in-us/)
- [lifesitenews.com/news/lifesite-daily…](https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesite-daily-news-for-monday-january-14-2002/) — secondary (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesite-daily-news-for-monday-january-14-2002/)

## Notes

Signature block not recovered; Washington Times original. No signature rows.

## Editorial note

The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric.