Open letter opposing Fernando Lugo cabinet nominations (Paraguay)

PL-2008-001 · July 9, 2008

Out of scope — international, not scored Secondary coverage only Coalition letter Unscored

Out of scope — international, not scored. Non-US coalition; kept for signatory network only, not scored.

Classification
Out of scope — international, not scored
Date
July 9, 2008
Lead organization
Federation of Associations for Life and Family (Paraguay)
Recipient
President-elect Fernando Lugo
Topic
Abortion policy / cabinet appointments
Type
Coalition letter
Verification
Secondary coverage only
Signature rows
None recovered
Completeness
Signature block not recovered

§ 1 Why there is no scorecard

The rubric measures one thing: how far a document falls short of the abolitionist standard, on six dimensions scored 0–2. It has nothing to measure in a document that does not fall short, so the dataset author left this record unscored and classified it by reading it instead.

Out of scope — international, not scored. Non-US coalition; kept for signatory network only, not scored.

Editor's note on this recordInternational; no US signers identified.

It is kept for its signatory network: the US organizations and people on it are normalized and linked, but the document itself is outside the scoring scope. Compare any scored letter's scorecard to see what the six dimensions look like when they apply.

§ 2 Signatories

Signature block not recovered. A letter record exists but the signature block was not located; no signature rows.

§ 3 Sources

Only press coverage located.

lifesitenews.com/news/suspended-bish…https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/suspended-bishop-and-president-elect-of-paraguay-selects-two-pro-abortion-m/
Secondary coverage only
Editorial note The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric; a disagreement is a disagreement with the rubric's conventions, not with an individual cell.