Faith & Freedom Coalition statement endorsing H.R. 36 (Pain-Capable 20-week ban)

PL-2017-002 · October 3, 2017 · formerly L23

Explicit incrementalist endorsement Primary source Single-organization statement 5 / 12

Explicit incrementalist endorsement. Explicitly endorses a regulatory/gestational bill or exceptions as policy.

Shortfall type
Explicit incrementalist endorsement
Date
October 3, 2017
Lead organization
Faith & Freedom Coalition
Recipient
Public / Congress
Topic
Pain-capable (20-week) legislation
Type
Single-organization statement
Verification
Primary source
Signature rows
1
Completeness
Single organization

§ 1 Key language

“a giant step in stopping the abhorrent practice” Faith & Freedom Coalition, October 3, 2017

§ 2 Scorecard

Composite 5 of 12 — explicit incrementalist endorsement. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale column is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score.

DimensionScoreMeaning at this scoreRationale
D1 Exceptions 2 Explicitly supports rape, incest or health exceptions Bill contains exceptions.
D2 Immunity for the mother fault line 0 None
D3 Incrementalism 2 Explicitly endorses a regulatory or gestational bill instead of abolition Gestational regulation.
D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills fault line 0 None
D5 Framing 0 None
D6 Secular framing 1 Mixed — mentions prayer or faith, or mixed religious signers Faith-adjacent but not Gospel-grounded.

§ 3 Spokesperson

1 signature row · Single organization. A single-organization record; the spokesperson row is illustrative, not a signature block.

#Name as printedTitle as printedOrganization as printed
1 Timothy R. Head Executive Director Faith & Freedom Coalition

§ 4 Organizations on this letter

1 distinct organization and 1 named individual, after normalizing renamed and affiliated entities.

Organizations

§ 5 Sources

Letter/statement text read from the organization’s own document.

ffcoalition.com/pain-capable-unborn…https://www.ffcoalition.com/pain-capable-unborn-child-protection-act-passes-u-s-house-representatives/
Primary source

§ 6 Notes

Legacy ID in the earlier research report: L23.

Editorial note The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric; a disagreement is a disagreement with the rubric's conventions, not with an individual cell.