SBA List statement opposing Louisiana HB 813

PL-2022-003 · May 2022 · formerly L03

Explicit opposition to a tenet Secondary coverage only Single-organization statement 7 / 12

Explicit opposition to a tenet. Takes a position directly contrary to an Abolitionists Rising tenet (exceptions, mother-immunity, opposing an abolition bill).

Shortfall type
Explicit opposition to a tenet
Date
May 2022
Lead organization
Susan B. Anthony List
Recipient
Press / Louisiana Legislature
Topic
State abolition bill
Type
Single-organization statement
Verification
Secondary coverage only
Signature rows
1
Completeness
Single organization

§ 1 Key language

“We strongly oppose HB 813” Susan B. Anthony List, May 2022

§ 2 Scorecard

Composite 7 of 12 — explicit opposition to a tenet. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale column is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score.

DimensionScoreMeaning at this scoreRationale
D1 Exceptions 0 None
D2 Immunity for the mother fault line 2 Explicitly opposes prosecuting or criminalizing women Cites concern about punishing women.
D3 Incrementalism 1 By implication — a funding, drug, research, Hyde or Title X letter that takes no abolition position Prefers incremental law.
D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills fault line 2 Explicitly opposes or lobbies against one Opposes abolition bill.
D5 Framing 0 None
D6 Secular framing 2 Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument Political framing.

§ 3 Spokesperson

1 signature row · Single organization. A single-organization record; the spokesperson row is illustrative, not a signature block.

#Name as printedTitle as printedOrganization as printed
1 Marjorie Dannenfelser President Susan B. Anthony List

§ 4 Organizations on this letter

1 distinct organization and 1 named individual, after normalizing renamed and affiliated entities.

Organizations

§ 5 Sources

Only press coverage located.

wwltv.comhttps://www.wwltv.com/
Secondary coverage only

§ 6 Notes

Legacy ID in the earlier research report: L03.

Editorial note The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric; a disagreement is a disagreement with the rubric's conventions, not with an individual cell.