§ 1 Key language
“Many states treat abortion as felony murder. Ours is a looser one”
Idaho Family Policy Center, May 2022
§ 2 Scorecard
Composite 4 of 12 — control record — meets or exceeds the standard. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale column is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score. This is a control record: Record that meets or exceeds the standard on the dimension at issue; kept for contrast, scores null or low.
Editor's note on this recordPushed Idaho toward stricter (equal-protection-like) treatment; closer to the standard than NRLC affiliates. Low composite reflects that.
| Dimension | Score | Meaning at this score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Exceptions | 1 | Implied — backs a bill known to contain them | — |
| D2 Immunity for the mother fault line | 1 | Implied | — |
| D3 Incrementalism | 0 | None | — |
| D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills fault line | 0 | None | — |
| D5 Framing | 0 | None | — |
| D6 Secular framing | 2 | Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument | — |
§ 3 Spokesperson
1 signature row · Single organization. A single-organization record; the spokesperson row is illustrative, not a signature block.
| # | Name as printed | Title as printed | Organization as printed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blaine Conzatti | President | Idaho Family Policy Center |
§ 4 Organizations on this letter
1 distinct organization and 1 named individual, after normalizing renamed and affiliated entities.
§ 5 Sources
Only press coverage located.
idahocapitalsun.com/2022/05/13/idahos-a…https://idahocapitalsun.com/2022/05/13/idahos-abortion-trigger-law-would-take-effect-30-days-after-roe-v-wade-is-overturned/
Secondary coverage only
§ 6 Notes
Legacy ID in the earlier research report: L15.
Editorial note
The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric; a disagreement is a disagreement with the rubric's conventions, not with an individual cell.