---
title: "Georgia Life Alliance non-support of / lobbying against HB 441 (equal protection, Rep. Emory Dunahoo)"
description: "Single-organization statement from Georgia Life Alliance, 2025, to Georgia Legislature. Composite 8/12 — explicit opposition to a tenet. “worked behind the scenes against the bill”"
type: "letter"
letter_id: "PL-2025-006"
date: "2025"
letter_type: "Single-organization statement"
lead_org: "Georgia Life Alliance"
recipient: "Georgia Legislature"
topic: "State equal-protection bill"
shortfall_type: "explicit_opposition_to_tenet"
composite: 8
verification: "secondary"
signature_rows: 1
primary_url: "https://faa.life/articles/who-is-stalling-equal-protection-in-georgia"
source_url: "https://www.abhortion.org/letters/pl-2025-006.html"
---

# Georgia Life Alliance non-support of / lobbying against HB 441 (equal protection, Rep. Emory Dunahoo)

**Single-organization statement** · 2025 · Explicit opposition to a tenet · composite 8 / 12 · Secondary coverage only

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Letter ID | PL-2025-006 |
| Date | 2025 |
| Lead organization | [Georgia Life Alliance](../letters/orgs/o046.md) |
| Recipient | Georgia Legislature |
| Topic | State equal-protection bill |
| Type | Single-organization statement |
| Verification | Secondary coverage only |
| Signature rows | 1 |
| Completeness | Single organization |

## Key language

> “worked behind the scenes against the bill” — Georgia Life Alliance, 2025

## Scorecard

Composite **8 of 12** — explicit opposition to a tenet. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score. D2 and D4 are the fault line the abolitionist critique cares most about.

| Dimension | Score | Meaning at this score | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| D1 Exceptions | 0 | None | — |
| D2 Immunity for the mother (fault line) | 1 | Implied | Implied. |
| D3 Incrementalism | 2 | Explicitly endorses a regulatory or gestational bill instead of abolition | Prefers HB 481 framework. |
| D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills (fault line) | 2 | Explicitly opposes or lobbies against one | Lobbied against equal-protection bill. |
| D5 Framing | 1 | Implied | Implied. |
| D6 Secular framing | 2 | Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument | Political framing. |

## Spokesperson

1 signature row · **Single organization.** A single-organization record; the spokesperson row is illustrative, not a signature block.

| # | Name as printed | Title as printed | Organization as printed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | — | — | [Georgia Life Alliance](../letters/orgs/o046.md) |

## Organizations on this letter

1 distinct organization, after normalizing renamed and affiliated entities.

- [Georgia Life Alliance](../letters/orgs/o046.md) — Advocacy or other, GA

## Sources

- [faa.life/articles/who-is-sta…](https://faa.life/articles/who-is-stalling-equal-protection-in-georgia) — Secondary coverage only (https://faa.life/articles/who-is-stalling-equal-protection-in-georgia)
- [faa.life/georgia](https://faa.life/georgia) — secondary (https://faa.life/georgia)

## Notes

Abolitionist-source characterization; GLA primary statement not located.

## Editorial note

The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric.