§ 1 Key language
“extension of the expiring restriction”
Pulse Life Advocates, May 13, 2026
§ 2 Scorecard
Composite 3 of 12 — incrementalist by implication. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale column is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score.
| Dimension | Score | Meaning at this score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Exceptions | 0 | None | — |
| D2 Immunity for the mother fault line | 0 | None | — |
| D3 Incrementalism | 1 | By implication — a funding, drug, research, Hyde or Title X letter that takes no abolition position | Seeks regulation/defunding/enforcement rather than abolition; takes no position on equal protection. |
| D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills fault line | 0 | None | — |
| D5 Framing | 0 | None | — |
| D6 Secular framing | 2 | Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument | Argued on fiscal, legal, medical or political grounds rather than Scripture/Gospel. |
§ 3 Signatories
Signature block not recovered. A letter record exists but the signature block was not located; no signature rows.
§ 4 Sources
Only press coverage located.
pulseforlife.orghttps://pulseforlife.org/
Secondary coverage only
erlc.com/policy-content/erlc…https://erlc.com/policy-content/erlc-joins-coalition-letter-urging-congressional-support-for-defunding-abortion-providers/
Secondary
§ 5 Notes
Signers not recovered.
Editorial note
The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life. This record is verified from secondary coverage only: the primary text has not yet been located, and its scores rest on language quoted in press coverage. Scores are judgment calls applied consistently by the published rubric; a disagreement is a disagreement with the rubric's conventions, not with an individual cell.