§ 1 Letters signed
4 letters, 2020–2024, oldest first. The last column shows who signed for the organization on that letter, with the title and organization name exactly as printed.
| Date | Letter | Score | Signed as |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2020 | Pro-life coalition letter to Secretary Azar: pro-life concerns during the coronavirus crisisCoalition letter · COVID-19 / abortion industry operationsBy implication | 2 / 12 | Thomas A. Glessner, J.D., Presidentas “National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)” |
| Mar 2021 | Pro-life coalition letter opposing the Equality Act (H.R. 5 / S. 393)Coalition letter · Equality Act / abortion mandateBy implication | 3 / 12 | Thomas A. Glessner, Presidentas “National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)” |
| Sep 7, 2021 | Pro-life coalition letter urging Congress to protect the Hyde Amendment in appropriations and reconciliationCoalition letter · Hyde AmendmentBy implication | 3 / 12 | Thomas A. Glessner, J.D., Presidentas “National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)” |
| Apr 2, 2024 | Open Letter to the Chairwoman of the North Dakota Republican Party opposing Resolution 6 (women as co-conspirators)Coalition letter · Equal-protection party resolutionExplicit opposition | 8 / 12 | Thomas A. Glessner, J.D., President |
§ 2 Scoring profile
Derived from the letters above — a description of what this organization put its name to, not a rating of the organization itself.
Letters signed
4
Mean composite
4 of 12
Fault-line letters
1 scored D2 or D4 ≥ 1
By shortfall type
1 explicit opposition · 3 by implication
§ 3 People who signed for this organization
| Person | Titles as printed | Letters |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas A. Glessneralso signed for 1 other organization | President | 4 |
§ 4 Names as printed
Every spelling of this organization encountered across the letters, merged into this one entry.
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA)
Editorial note
Organization type, state and parent organization are heuristics for filtering, not authoritative registrations. State Right-to-Life and Citizens-for-Life bodies are linked to the National Right to Life Committee by naming pattern — inferred, not verified. The rubric records distance from the standard published by Abolitionists Rising, not a moral verdict; every organization scored here regards itself as pro-life.