§ 1 Key language
§ 2 Scorecard
Composite 8 of 12 — explicit opposition to a tenet. Each dimension is scored 0 (none), 1 (implied) or 2 (explicit); the rationale column is the editor's one-line reason for every non-zero score.
| Dimension | Score | Meaning at this score | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 Exceptions | 0 | None | — |
| D2 Immunity for the mother fault line | 2 | Explicitly opposes prosecuting or criminalizing women | Reaffirms 2022 letter; opposes charging women. |
| D3 Incrementalism | 1 | By implication — a funding, drug, research, Hyde or Title X letter that takes no abolition position | Redirects to incremental legislation. |
| D4 Opposition to abolition or equal-protection bills fault line | 2 | Explicitly opposes or lobbies against one | Asks delegates to reject equal-protection resolution. |
| D5 Framing | 1 | Implied | "through the legislative process". |
| D6 Secular framing | 2 | Wholly secular, legal, fiscal, medical or political argument | Secular framing (CLI coercion data). |
§ 3 Signatories
18 signature rows · 18 reported by the letter · Complete from letter text. Full signature block transcribed from the letter itself. Rows are transcribed as printed, in the order they appear; names link to the person, organizations to the organization.
§ 4 Organizations on this letter
17 distinct organizations and 18 named individuals, after normalizing renamed and affiliated entities.
§ 5 Sources
Letter/statement text read from the organization’s own document.
§ 6 Notes
Quotes the 2022 NRLC letter verbatim and cites its PDF.
Legacy ID in the earlier research report: L16.